< > Home : FAQ : Professional : Chlamydiales : Immunobiology : Infections : Diagnosis & Treatment : Links : Contact Us


Chlamydophila pecorum: Laboratory diagnosis

C. pecorum isolates, particularly those from the intestinal tract, are frequently difficult to isolate in culture,  growing initially then dying out on serial passage. Cryptic infections also occur in cell culture, whereby the organism is hard to detect by conventional methods although, following several passages in culture, it may again revert to a more obvious cytopathic infection (Philips and Clarkson, 1995). 

Serological detection of C. pecorum agents using the complement fixation screening test is problematic because the organism is very common in ruminants and antibodies to it cross-react with other chlamydiae,  particularly C. abortus, with which C. pecorum is often associated. Antibodies to C. pecorum and C. abortus can be distinguised using immunofluorescence (Markey et al., 1993; Griffiths et al., 1996). Jones et al. (1997) have suggested that false seropositivity in field samples for enzootic abortion may be caused by the polyarthritis / conjunctivitis subtype of C. pecorum. Additionally the C. pecorum strains associated with metritis have not yet been fully characterised, but may represent a separate biovar within C. pecorum (Jones, 1999). 

Given the problems of antigenic cross reactions, there is a strong incentive to use DNA-based techniques, where a clear distinction can be made between C. pecorum, C. abortus and other chlamydial species. PCR and other tests have been developed for this purpose (Kaltenboeck et al., 1992; Everett et al., 1999; Magnino et al., 2000). Using this kind of approach, chlamydial strains causing endometritis in cattle in northern Italy were identified by sequencing the gene encoding the chlamydial major outer membrane protein as being C. pecorum (Magnino et al., 2000), a method particularly useful for moleulcar epidemiological studies of individual strains. For species identification, analyses based on the rRNA genes offer considerable possibility for the development of improved diagnostic tests (Everett et al., 1999; Magnino et al., 2000).

NEXT: C. pecorum: Typing

 


< > Home : FAQ : Professional : Chlamydiales : ImmunoBiology : Infections : Diagnosis &  Treatment : Links : Contact Us

This is    www.chlamydiae.com        

Arabic(1): Arabic(2): Chinese (simplified): Chinese (traditional): European languages Japanese: RussianThai: Google online translation: Other languages