|
|
Prospects for Chlamydial Vaccine Development.Introduction: History of chlamydial vaccine development.Chlamydial infections tend to be insidious, with the individual frequently not aware they are infected. These infections tend to "grumble on" for a long time and, left untreated, may lead to severe problems such as blindness, infertility, pneumonia and perhaps, in the case of C. pneumoniae, enhanced coronary artery disease. In the poorest parts of the world where trachoma tends to be found, antibiotic treatment may be unavailable or difficult to sustain. Under these circumstances prevention would seem better than cure. Compared with antibiotic therapy, an effective vaccine offers a much more sustained, though indirect, anti-chlamydial effect. However the relative weakness of natural immunity to chlamydial infections suggests that developing a vaccine is not going to be easy. The hope must be that, by focusing on selected, potentially protective chlamydial components (antigens), and by carefully maximizing the host protective response it may be possible to improve on nature. Empirical attempts were made in the 1960s and early 1970s by four major groups to prevent trachoma by vaccination. The vaccines used were whole, dead, C. trachomatis organisms, relatively crude by today's standards. The general impression is that, at best, these vaccines produced short term protection against natural infection with organisms related to the vaccine strain. Short term protection was also observed in blind volunteers experimentally inoculated with C. trachomatis. However in some instances it appeared that vaccination might have enhanced the severity of ocular disease when individuals became re-infected, particularly if a low strength vaccine preparation was used. This is consistent with the view that some of the severe damage associated with chronic chlamydial infection (e.g. scarring distortion of the eyelids or blockage of the fallopian tubes) may be caused in certain individuals by the immune response to the infection [see: immunopathology]. At around the same time, damaging responses against vaccines directed against other infectious agents, such as respiratory syncytial virus and measles, were also reported. Eventually, the trachoma vaccine trials were abandoned. [Thumbnail slide: Progress on the way to a chlamydial vaccine.] Renewed attempts to protect against C. trachomatis infection were made in the mid 1980s following the discovery that the major outer membrane protein (MOMP) of C. trachomatis was able to generate neutralising antibodies capable of blocking chlamydial infection of host cells [Caldwell & Perry, 1982]. It was possible to identify the precise regions of MOMP (so called B cell epitopes) that generated neutralizing antibody [Conlan et al., 1988, 1989; Stephens et al., 1988; Zhong & Brunham, 1991]. Unfortunately, despite sustained efforts over the next decade, it became clear that subunit vaccines against MOMP were not the answer. There were difficulties in preparing MOMP with the native 3-dimensional structure thought necessary to generate effective neutralising antibody. There were also fundamental immunological problems as to how best sustain adequate levels of secretory antibody at the superficial mucosal surfaces of the body that C. trachomatis infects; a problem which has yet to be solved. [Thumbnail: It's not so easy to develop vaccines against chlamydiae!] Fortunately, as this approach began to run out of steam, experiments in gene knock-out mice in the mid 1990s demonstrated the key role of cell mediated immunity, rather than of neutralizing antibody, in protective immunity to chlamydial infections [Cotter et al., 1997; Johannson et al., 1997, 1998; Morrison et al., 1995 and others]. This came together with a number of other things: realization of the key role of dendritic cells in the immune response [Stagg et al., 1993; Su et al., 1998]; availability of whole genomic sequences for Chlamydia [Stephens et al., 1998] and Chlamydophila [Kalman et al., 1999] species that, for the first time, indicated what chlamydiae are composed of. This in turn opened up systematic new methods using vaccines based on chlamydial genes (DNA vaccines) to identify chlamydial components involved with protective immunity. For the first time major vaccine companies (Antex, Aventis-Pasteur, Corixa) have entered chlamydial vaccine research, developing vaccines against both C. pneumoniae and C. trachomatis. The following sections briefly describe the evidence for protective immunity in chlamydial infection, the basis of protective immunity, the current approach to chlamydial vaccine development and C. pneumoniae vaccines. [MEW] June 2002 NEXT: Evidence for protective immunity ReferencesCaldwell, H. D. & Perry, L. J. (1982). Neutralization
of Chlamydia trachomatis infectivity with antibodies to the major outer
membrane protein. Infection and Immunity 38,
745 - 754. Conlan, J. W., Clarke, I. N. & Ward, M. E.
(1988). Epitope
mapping with solid phase peptides: identification of type-, subspecies-,
species- and genus-reactive antibody binding domains on the major outer membrane
protein of Chlamydia trachomatis. Molecular Microbiology 2,
673 - 679. Conlan, J. W., Kajbaf, M., Clarke, I. N., Chantler, S. &
Ward, M. E. (1989). The
major outer membrane protein of Chlamydia trachomatis: critical binding
site and conformation determine the specificity of antibody binding to viable
chlamydiae. Molecular Microbiology 3, 311 -
318. Cotter,
T. W., Ramsey, K. H., Miranpuri, G. S. et al.,
(1997). Dissemination
of Chlamydia trachomatis chronic genital tract infection in gamma
interferon gene knockout mice. Infection and Immunity 65,
2145 - 2152. Full
article Johansson,
M., Schon, K., Ward, M. E & Lycke, N. (1997). Genital
tract infection with Chlamydia trachomatis fails to induce protective
immunity in gamma interferon receptor deficient mice despite a strong local
immunoglobulin A response. Infection and Immunity 65,
1032 - 1044. Full
article Johansson, M., Schon, K., Ward,
M. & Lycke N. (1997). Front
line: Studies in knockout mice reveal that anti-chlamydial protection requires
TH1 cells producing IFN-gamma: is this true for humans? Scandinavian
Journal of
Immunology 46,
546 - 552.
Kalman, S., Mitchell, W., Marathe, R., et
al., (1999). Comparative
genomes of Chlamydia pneumoniae and C. trachomatis. Nature
Genetics 21, 385-389. Full
article Knight, S. C., Iqball, S., Woods, C., Stagg, A.,
Ward, M. E. & Tuffrey, M. (1995). A
peptide of Chlamydia trachomatis shown to be a primary T-cell epitope in
vitro induces cell-mediated immunity in vivo. Immunology
85, 8-15. Morrison, R. P., Feilzer, K. & Tumas, D. B. (1995). Gene
knockout mice establish a primary protective role for major histocompatibility
complex class II-restricted responses in Chlamydia trachomatis genital
tract infection. Infection and Immunity 63,
4661 - 4668. Stagg, A. J., Elsley, W. A., Pickett, M. A., Ward, M. E.
& Knight, S. C. (1993). Primary
human T-cell responses to the major outer membrane protein of Chlamydia
trachomatis. Immunology 79, 1 - 9. Stephens, R. S., Wagar, E. A. & Schoolnik,
G. K. (1988). High
resolution mapping of serovar-specific and common antigenic determinants of the
major outer membrane protein of Chlamydia trachomatis. Journal of
Experimental Medicine 167, 817 - 831. Stephens, R. S., Kalman,
S., Lammel, C. et al., (1998). Genome
sequence of an obligate intracellular pathogen of humans: Chlamydia
trachomatis. Science 282, 754 - 759. Su, H., Messer, R., Whitmire, W., Fischer, E., Portis, J. C.
& Caldwell, H. D. (1998). Vaccination
against chlamydial genital tract infection after immunization with dendritic
cells pulsed ex vivo with nonviable Chlamydiae. Journal
of Experimental Medicine 188, 809 - 818. Full
article Zhong, G. M. & Brunham, R. C. (1991) Antigenic
determinants of the chlamydial major outer membrane protein resolved at a single
amino acid level. Infection and Immunity 59,
1141 - 1147. NEXT: Evidence for protective immunity
|