< > Home : FAQ : Professional : Chlamydiales : Immunobiology : Infections : Diagnosis & Treatment : Links : Contact Us


Plant Chlamydia relationships

Introduction

Back in the late 1960s as a raw Microbiology undergraduate, the early theories relating bacteria to the evolution of subcellular organelles in eukaryotes intrigued me. As the chlamydial genome was unravelled, it was fascinating to find that chlamydiae had a large number of "plant-like" genes, most of them associated with the plastid (chloroplast), the powerhouse of photosynthesis on which human life itself depends. At the time I wrote the first part of this article in 2002 and 2003, it was thought that chlamydiae and cyanobacteria might share an ancestral relationship. Some of the evidence for that is summarised in the original article, which I have chosen to leave unrevised. Since then much more genomic data have become available, most notably for an environmental Protochlamydia endosymbiotic in amoebae and for the extremophilic red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae. In updating the original, I have focussed on a milestone paper published in 2007 in which Jinling Huang and Johann Gogarten argue that chlamydial endosymbiosis played a crucial role in the establishment of primary plastids from cyanobacteria. This view is supported by further work from the Bhattacharya group.

[MEW] February 2008


Part 1: August 2003 original: Chloroplasts

One of the most unexpected findings of the genome sequencing of the Chlamydiaceae was the relatively high proportion of genes with highest similarity to plant gene sequences [Stephens et al., 1998]. It was suggested that a Chlamydia ancestor might have acquired such genes from a plant or plant-like amoebal host by horizontal gene transfer [Royo et al., 2000; Stephens et al., 1998; Wolf et al., 1999; see: last common ancestor]. Such a process would be facilitated by the intimate association between Chlamydiaceae and their host cells. Brinkman et al., 2002 developed software tools to detect bacterial proteins which were more similar in their primary sequence to eukaryotic proteins than to other bacterial or archaeal proteins (and vice versa). They found that 65% of bacterial proteins identified with the highest similarity to a eukaryotic protein involved Chlamydia, ChlamydophilaSynechocystis, or Rickettsia, even though these organisms only accounted for 14% of the genes analysed.

The associations with Rickettsia and  Synechocystis were not surprising. As long ago as 1885 Schimper suggested that chloroplasts were derived from symbiotic microorganisms, while Mereschkowsky in 1905 argued persuasively that chloroplasts developed from different types of cyanobacteria. This whole concept of the endosymbiotic origin of life has been vigorously championed by Margulis, [see Margulis 1981] and the evidence for it is now regarded as overwhelming [Archibald & Keeling, 2002]. Mitochondria, the energy generators of our own cells, are thought to be the end result of symbiosis between an intracellular bacterium having an ancestral relationship to Rickettsia and a host eukaryote [Andersson et al., 1998]. Similarly land plants are thought to be the beneficiaries of a second symbiosis between an ancestral blue green bacterium (cyanobacterium) related to Synechocystis and a mitochondria-bearing host which eventually yielded the light harvesting chloroplast characteristic of green plants [Reumann & Keegstra, 1999].  It is thought most of these genes were transferred from the endosymbiotic bacterium to the host nucleus during the transition of endosymbiont to organelle [Gray 1992; Martin et al., 2002] but many genes of prokaryotic origin remain in the eukaryotic nucleus [Martin et al., 2002]. Indeed the estimated 4,500 cyanobacterial genes in the Arabidopsis genome is approximately 1000 more genes than is present in the Synechocystis genome [Archibald & Keeling, 2003]. As Palenik, 2002 wittily put it, the hosts keep both the baby and the bath water. Nevertheless, the number of plant-like genes in the Chlamydiaceae genomes is puzzling as the Chlamydiaceae have no known relationship with any eukaryotic organelle. Moreover, although recombination events may occur within strains of C. trachomatis  [Hayes et al., 1994; see recombination in MOMP] horizontal gene transfer outside the Chlamydiales seems unlikely given both the high degree of conservation across known chlamydial genomic sequences [Read et al., 2000] and the fact that the Chlamydiaceae have a notably lower variance in the Guanine + Cytosine ratio for their genes than is observed for the genome of any other microbe sequenced to date [Brinkman et al., 2002]. This apparently clonal nature of Chlamydia and lack of horizontal gene transfer may be due to their ecological isolation as a result of imprisonment in the inclusion vacuole [Read et al., 2000]. Significantly, the apparent lack of horizontal gene transfer involving Chlamydia indicates that chlamydiae may be a useful model for studies of gene evolutionary rates [Jordan et al., 2001] or for determining to what degree factors other than horizontal gene transfer can affect certain genomic properties [Brinkman et al., 2002].

The vast majority of plant-like genes in the Chlamydiaceae are related to chloroplast gene sequences [Brinkman et al., 2002]. This might be due either to the acquisition of chloroplast related genes which we have seen is unlikely, or to a closer than suspected relationship with the ancestral cyanobacteria which themselves gave rise to Synechocystis and chloroplasts. It has previously been suggested that Synechocystis and the family Chlamydiaceae form sister groups [Nelson et al., 2000], though not with a high level of confidence. Analysis of an unspliced group I intron in 23S rRNA also supported a possible link between the Chlamydiaceae and the chloroplast lineage [Everett et al., 1999]. Following analysis of multiple bacterial and chloroplast genes and genomes, Brinkman et al., 2002  concluded that there is a substantial relationship between the Chlamydiaceae and cyanobacterial/chloroplast lineages. It was suggested that the high proportion of plant-like genes in the Chlamydiaceae is a reflection of an ancient, ancestral relationship between the Chlamydiaceae and the cyanobacterial ancestor of the chloroplast [Brinkman et al., 2002].

Clearly organellar ancestry must be considered in any case where a eukaryotic gene shares higher-than-expected similarity to bacterial homologues. But why should the Chlamydiaceae and other bacteria contain genes with notable sequence similarity with organellar genes when there are other species, such as Synechocystis and Rickettsia, with an even closer relationship with organellar ancestors? Firstly, Brinkman et al., 2002 showed that the number of eukaryotic organelle-related genes in the Chlamydiaceae is far lower than in cyanobacterial or rickettsial genomes. Secondly, the effects of gene loss on bacterial genome evolution have to be considered. Thus, Synechocystis might have lost a gene that is still present in Chlamydiaceae and the chloroplast, making the chlamydial gene appear most similar to the chloroplast. Given that the analysis was based on a single completed cyanobacterial genome and that most cases of plant-Chlamydiaceae gene-similarity lacked a Synechocystis homologue for comparison [Brinkman et al., 2002] this seems quite likely. These isolated cases (far fewer than the number of cases of Synechocystis genes resembling chloroplast genes) probably reflect gene loss in the Synechocystis lineage. Thus, existing knowledge of cyanobacteria, to which the Chlamydiaceae appear related, may stimulate new ways of thinking about the function and control of pathogenic chlamydiae [Brinkman et al., 2002 ]. However the finding of environmental chlamydia - like phylotypes in the plant rhizosphere [Schmalenberger & Tebbe, 2002] indicates other possible mechanisms by which environmental chlamydiae might acquire plant genes.

[MEW comment: Conversely, because of obligate intracellular parasitism, genomic degradation must be far more extensive in chlamydiae than in Synechocystis; see: genomic degradation. It is possible that some of the plant genes currently considered as cyanobacterial might be more closely related to genes of the last common chlamydial ancestor. Interestingly the Glaucocystophyte algae, which have a primary prokaryote-derived plastid, are the only algae to retain vestiges of  characteristically bacterial peptidoglycan in their chloroplast; Archibald & Keeling, 2002]. 

CMP-KDO Synthetase

The eight-carbon acid sugar 3-deoxy-D-manno-octulosonate (KDO) is an essential component of the endotoxic lipopolysaccharide or, occasionally, capsular polysaccharide found on the outer surface of Gram-negative bacteria. However, it has recently been realised that this sugar is also present in the cell wall polysaccharides of green algae and in the pectin component of the cell walls of higher plants. A key enzyme in the synthesis of KDO is CMP-KDO synthetase, without which KDO cannot be incorporated into cell wall polymers. Royo et al., 2000 identified a maize gene which encodes a protein analogous to CMP-KDO synthetase. Phylogenetic analysis of genes in prokaryotic gene databases indicated that chlamydial CMP-KDO synthetase is most closely related to this plant gene. Two explanations are offered for this observation.

  1. The endosymbiont hypothesis suggests eukaryotes were derived from the association of an archaea-like host with eubacteria. Subsequently, a number of genes from the endosymbionts were transferred to the host genome. Neither Rickettsiae (mitochondria) nor Synechocystis (chloroplasts) encode CMP-KDO synthetase; thus the plant CMP-KDO genes could only originate from the endosymbiont precursor of mitochondria. It is suggested that the eukaryotic lineage leading to animals and yeast lost the gene because it was of no advantage, whereas it was retained in plants because the sugar KDO became a component of their extracellular polysaccharides.
     
  2. Horizontal transfer of the gene encoding CMP-KDO synthetase from a chlamydial ancestor to the plant. This must have occurred soon after the separation of the plant lineage from other eukaryotes since the gene is present in every major plant group. However, as argued in the previous section, horizontal gene transfer to chlamydiae is considered to be rare.

At the present time the significance of this intriguing observation is unclear. As Royo et al., 2000 suggest, analysis of the plant genes coding for other enzymes of the KDO synthetic pathway may help interpretation of the evolutionary significance of this finding.

[MEW] August 2003


Part 2: Update Feb 2008

The evolutionary history of the chloroplast (plastid) unfolded over a billion years ago, when a previously non-photosynthetic protist engulfed and subsequently maintained a free-living cyanobacterium in its cytoplasm. Chloroplasts allowed the evolution of algae and the plants that form the base of the food chain for most of the ecosystems on planet Earth. For this symbiosis to have survived, it is clear the host must early on have derived some advantage, such as integration of the host and parasite metabolic systems. Completion of the relatively primitive environmental Protochlamydia genome and the genome for a red green alga, Cyanidioschyzon merolae has thrown additional insight onto how this evolutionary process may have occurred. 

It has already been remarked that an unexpected number of chlamydial genes are most similar to plant homologues and, interestingly, often contain a plastid-targeting signal. This might be accounted for by gene transfer between chlamydiae and plant-related groups and an ancestral relationship between chlamydiae and cyanobacteria, which are thought to be the primitive ancestors of photosynthesis. Huang & Gogarten (2007) conducted phylogenomic analyses of the red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae genomic sequence to identify genes specifically related to chlamydial homologues. Among the 4771 predicted protein coding genes of the alga, using strict criteria, 16 of these were probably Chlamydiales-related genes of which 14 were also found in green plants. Most of these genes were related to plastids. 5 other previously reported genes from green plants were reclassified as probably Chlamydiales-related. Chlamydiales-like genes were present in all primary photosynthetic eukaryotic lineages examined including a glycophyte, euglenids, a diatom and a haptophyte. Further, a Chlamydiales-like ADP/ATP translocase has been retained in at least some secondary photsynthetic groups also (i.e. eukaryotic lineages that emerged by engulfing another algal cell as endosymbiont). Not surprisingly, the Chlamydiales-related genes were most similar to those of the environmental Protochlamydia which are found in amoebae.

As discussed earlier, it was originally thought that chlamydiae might have acquired their plant-related genes by transfer from plants. However most of these genes are predominantly distributed in bacteria, suggesting that the reverse might be the case. However the picture is made complex by a lack of data and because of probable gene loss during evolution. Plastid to chlamydiae transfer implies a cyanobacterial origin for the transferred genes, but this does not explain why for many of the genes there is a strong relationship of chlamydiae-like genes to the Protochlamydia homologues (eg Fig 1a). It is also incompatible with the fact that the cyanobacterial homologues form a distinct group (eg Fig 1b). This is unexpected since, as plastids are believed to be of cyanobacterial origin, it would be normally expected that any gene acquired from plastids by chlamydiae should be more closely related to cyanobacteria than to other bacterial sequences. Moreover 5 of the Chlamydiales-like genes in photosynthetic eukaryotes lacked identifiable cyanobacterial homologues. Thus it was considered more likely that the majority of these Chlamydiales-like genes were probably transferred from (presumably aquatic) Chlamydiales to primary photosynthetic eukaryotes.

Fig 1. Example genes of plastidic and chlamydial origin.

Figure 1. (Double click to enlarge the thumbnails). Primary photosynthetic eukaryotes contain gene copies of both plastidic and chlamydial origin. Figures above the branch show bootstrap values for maximum likelihood and distance analyses respectively. Asterisks indicate values <50%. (a) gcpE diphosphate synthetase. Sequences from red algae and glaucophytes are of plastidic origin whereas those from green plants, apicomplexans, haptophytes and chlorarachniophytes are of chlamydial origin. (b) Enoyl-ACP reductase (fabl). Here sequences from green plants, diatoms, chlorarachniophytes and apicomplexans form a strongly supported group whereas cyanobacterial and red alga Cyanidoschyzon homologues form another distinct group. The colours represent different phylogenetic affiliations. These figures reproduced by kind permission from the paper of Huang and Gogarten, 2007.

The results exemplified in Fig 1 raise the question as to whether there is an ancestral relationship between the Chlamydiales and the Cyanobacteria? Although this has been postulated, it has not been rigorously tested. If chlamydiae and cyanobacteria shared a common ancestor then it would be expected that sequences of a plastidic nature would have a stronger relationship to cyanobacteria, which with the exception of the genes in Fig 1, is usually not the case. Huang and Gogarten (2007) discuss the issue at length and conclude that chlamydiae and cyanobacteria are not ancestrally related. Chlamydial genes might have been transferred to the cyanobacterial progenitor of plastids, perhaps being transferred from plastids to the nucleus of photosynthetic eukaryotes. This was considered unlikely as thus far no chlamydiae-like genes have been found in extant cyanobacteria. The presence of chlamydiae-like genes in red algae and glaucophytes, which are not food sources for insects, makes participation of an insector vector of chlamydial gene transfer to these plants also unlikely while also contradicting the molecular and fossil record.

The high number of genes transferred between chlamydiae and photosynthetic eukaryotes implies that there was a stable association of these two groups in the past. Symbiosis is the most likely explanation given that all known chlamydiae are obligate endosymbionts of eukaryotic cells. Huang and Gogarten (2007) therefore proposed that the Chlamydiales-like genes in plants arose as an ancient chlamydial endosymbiosis with the ancestral primary photosynthetic eukaryote. They suggest that three organisms were involved in establishing the primary photosynthetic lineage: the eukaryotic host cell, a cyanobacterial endosymbiont that provided photosynthetic capability, and a chlamydial endosymbiont or parasite that facilitated the establishment of the cyanobacterial endosymbiont. The complex interactions that may have been necessary to establish the primary endosymbiotic relationship between plastid and host cytoplasms, and thereby explaining the rarity with which long-term successful endosymbiotic relationships between heterotrophs and photoautotrophs were established, are illustrated in Figure 2.


Fig 2. Hypothetical stages showing the involvement of chlamydiae in the origin and establishment of plastids. From Huang and Gogarten (2007) and reproduced by kind permission of Jinling Huang.

(A). The initial target was a mitochondrion-containing eukaryote. The mitochondrion, of alpha-proteobacterial origin, is shown in white.

(B). A Chlamydiales bacterium (yellow), similar to the extant Protochlamydia, entered as a bacterial parasite but became transiently symbiotic. It had the metabolic capability to gain nutrients from the host cell. By chance a once free-living photoautotrophic cyanobacterium (green) was captured by the cell, perhaps ingested as food. The arrows indicate which of the symbiotic partners received benefit. Gene transfer occurred between the chlamydiae and host because of proximity. The host acquired transporters from the chlamydiae facilitating communication with the cyanobacterial captive. Dashed lines indicate direction of intracellular transfer whereas solid lines show protein targeting of the transferred genes.

(C). Gene transfer occurred between the cyanobacterium and host cell. The cyanobacterial captive gradually transformed into a photosynthetic organelle (a plastid) which provided product to the host. In turn from the host it gained shelter, metabolites and transported protein products of the transferred genes originating from the chlamydiae and the cyanobacteria.

(D). With the plastid established, the chlamydial endosymbiont became less important to the host. It may have reverted to being primarily a bacterial parasite.

(E). The chlamydial parasitism could not be indefinitely sustained, leading to its degeneration. Crosses indicate chlamydial endosymbiont and gene transfer processes that might not exist in extant photosynthetic eukaryotes. It is possible that the chlamydial parasite became an as yet unrecognised organelle in photosynthetic eukaryotes.

 


The work of Huang and Gogarten (2007) provides strong support for a common origin of all primary photosynthetic eukaryotes and of the plastids they harbour. It is the most satisfying explanation to date for the anomalous presence of such large numbers of plant gene homologues in chlamydiae and is consistent with current theories on the evolution of plastids from cyanobacteria, see Nozaki, 2005.

Note added 7/2/2008: I am grateful to Danielle Corsaro who, via the contact form, drew my attention to the paper of Tyra et al., 20007. These authors postulated that the re-targeting of existing host solute transporters to the plastid fore-runner must have been crucial for the early success of the primary endosymbiosis, allowing the host to harvest endosymbiont primary metabolic production. Accordingly they conducted a comprehensive analysis of the plastid permeome in the brassica, Arabidopsis thaliana, (Thale Cress) the first higher plant to have its genome sequenced.  Of 137 well-annotated transporter proteins that were initially considered, 83 that are broadly distributed in plants were submitted to phylogenetic analysis. The results indicated that 58% of Arabidopsis transporters, including all carbohydrate transporters, were of host origin, whereas only 12% arose from the cyanobacterial endosymbiont. However, four transporter genes were derived from a Chlamydiales-like source (2 of which are shown below), suggesting that establishment of the primary plastid likely involved contributions from at least two prokaryotic sources. This therefore supports the hypothesis of Huang and Gogarten (2007) that important contributions in the evolution of the chloroplast came from the cyanobacterial endosymbiont and Protochlamydia-like bacteria co-resident in the first algae.

Fig 3. Phyllogeny of two plastid targeted solute transporters of putative "Chlamydia-like" origin in plants.

Fig 3 (a). ADP/ATP translocase. The different photosynthetic groups are coloured: blue-cyanobacteria, red-red algae, green-green algae and land plants, magenta-glaucophytes, brown-chromalveolates. Fig 3 (b). As 3 (a). Heavy metal ATPase (HMA1) copper transporter.

Figure 3 reproduced from Tyra et al., 2007.

 


[MEW] February 2008

NEXT: Evolution Index   Main Index   Biology Index

References

Andersson, S.G., Zomorodipour, A., Andersson, J.O., Sicheritz-Ponten, T., Alsmark, U.C., Podowski, R.M., Naslund, A.K., Eriksson, A.S., Winkler, H.H., and Kurland, C.G. (1998). The genome sequence of Rickettsia prowazekii and the origin of mitochondria. Nature 396, 133 - 140.

Archibald, J. M. & Keeling, P. J. (2002). Recycled plastids: a "green movement" in eukaryotic evolution. Trends in Genetics 18, 577-584. Full article [Fascinating review outlining how the rephagocytosis of cyanobacteria-derived plastids generated much of the diversity of phototrophic eukaryotes].

Archibald, J. M & Keeling, P. J. (2003). Comparative genomics: Plant genomes: cyanobacterial genes revealed. Heredity 90, 2-3. Full article

Brinkman, F. S., Blanchard, J. L., Cherkasov, A., Av-Gay, Y., Brunham, R. C., Fernandez, R. C. et al., (2002). Evidence that plant-like genes in Chlamydia species reflect an ancestral relationship between Chlamydiaceae, cyanobacteria, and the chloroplast. Genome Research 12, 1159 - 1167. [Excellent and provocative paper

Everett K. D. E., Kahane S, Bush R. M.  Friedman, M. G. (1999). An unspliced group I intron in 23S rRNA links Chlamydiales, chloroplasts, and mitochondria. Journal of Bacteriology 181, 4734 - 4740.  Full article

Gray, M. W. (1992). The endosymbiont hypothesis revisited. International Reviews of Cytology 141: 233-357

Hayes, L. J., Yearsley, P., Treharne, J. D., Ballard, R., Fehler, G. H. & Ward, M. E. (1994). Evidence for naturally occurring recombination in the gene encoding the major outer membrane protein of lymphogranuloma venereum isolates of C. trachomatis. Infection and  Immunity 62, 5659 - 5663. [Clear cross over point in VS2 subsequently confirmed by Millman et al., 2001]

Huang, J. & Gogarten, J. P. (2007). Did an ancient chlamydial endosymbiosis facilitate the establishment of primary plastids?. Genome Biology 8(6): R99. [Thoughtful and detailed paper. On open access and well worth reading].    Full article [Acrobat]

Jordan, I.K., Kondrashov, F.A., Rogozin, I.B., Tatusov, R.L., Wolf, Y.I. & Koonin E. V. (2001). Constant relative rate of protein evolution and detection of functional diversification among bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic proteins. Genome Biol. 2(12):RESEARCH0053 Full article [Acrobat]

Kalman, S., Mitchell, W., Marathe, R., et al., (1999). Comparative genomes of Chlamydia pneumoniae and C. trachomatis. Nature Genetics 21, 385-389. Full article [Acrobat]

Margulis, L. (1981) Symbiosis in Cell Evolution: Life and Its Environment on the Early Earth pub Freeman, San Francisco.

Mereschkowsky, C. (1905) Biol. Zent. Bl. 25, 593-604.

Martin, W. et al., (2002). Evolutionary analysis of Arabidopsis, cyanobacterial, and chloroplast genomes reveals plastid phylogeny and thousands of cyanobacterial genes in the nucleus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science U S A. 99, 12246 - 12251.

Nelson, K. E., Paulsen, I. T., Heidelberg, J. F. & Fraser, C. M. (2000). Status of genome projects for nonpathogenic bacteria and archaea. Nature Biotechnology 18, 1049 - 1054

Nozaki, H. (2005). A new scenario of plastid evolution: plastid primary endosymbiosis before the divergence of the "Plantae," emended. Journal of Plant Research 118(4) 247 - 255.  

Ogata, H., et al., (2001). Mechanisms of evolution in Rickettsia conorrii and R. rickettsii Science 293, 2093 - 2098.

Palenik, B. (2002). The genomics of symbiosis: hosts keep the baby and the bath water. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A. 99, 11996 - 11997.

Read, T. D., Brunham, R. C., Shen, C., et al., (2000). Genome sequences of Chlamydia trachomatis MoPn and Chlamydia pneumoniae AR39. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 1397 - 1406.Full article [Acrobat]  

Reumann, S. & Keegstra, K. (1999). The endosymbiotic origin of the protein import machinery of chloroplastic envelope membranes. Trends in Plant Science 4, 302 - 307

Royo, J., Gimez, E. & Hueros, G. (2000). CMP-KDO synthetase: a plant gene borrowed from gram-negative eubacteria. Trends in Genetics 16, 432 - 433.

Schimper, A. F. W. (1885). Jahrbuecher fuer Wissenschaftliche Botanik 16, 1 - 247. [Has the distinction of being the oldest reference on chlamydiae.com (so don't expect in electronic format)! This guy was really far-sighted].

Schmalenberger, A. & Tebbe, C. C. (2002). Bacterial diversity in maize rhizospheres: conclusions on the use of genetic profiles based on PCR-amplified partial small subunit rRNA genes in ecological studies. Molecular Ecology 12, 251 - 262.

Shirai, M., et al., (2000). Comparison of whole genome sequences of Chlamydia pneumoniae J138 from Japan and CWL029 from USA. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 2311 - 2314. Full article [Acrobat]

Stephens, R. S. (1999). Genomic autobiographies of chlamydiae. Chapter 2, pp 9 – 27 In: Chlamydia Intracellular Biology, Pathogenesis and Immunity (Stephens, R. S. editor). ASM Press, Washington. ISBN 1-55581-155-8.

Stephens, R. S., Kalman, S., Lammel, C. et al., (1998). Genome sequence of an obligate intracellular pathogen of humans: Chlamydia trachomatis. Science 282, 754 - 759. [The first chlamydial genome sequence]

Tyra, H. M., Linka, M., Weber, A. P. &  Bhattacharya, D. (2007). Host origin of plastid solute transporters in the first photosynthetic eukaryotes. Genome Biology Oct 5;8(10):R212. Full paper [Acrobat]

Wolf, Y. L,, I. Aravind, and E.V. Koonin., (1999). Rickettsiae and Chlamydiae. Evidence of horizontal gene transfer and gene exchange. Trends in Genetics 15, 173 - 175. Full article (Biomednet)

Zomorodipour, A, and Andersson, S. G. E. (1999). Obligate intracellular parasites: Rickettsia prowazekii and Chlamydia trachomatis. FEBS Letters 452, 11 - 15.


< > Home : FAQ : Professional : Chlamydiales : ImmunoBiology : Infections : Diagnosis &  Treatment : Links : Contact Us

This is    www.chlamydiae.com        

Arabic(1): Arabic(2): Chinese (simplified): Chinese (traditional): European languages Japanese: RussianThai: Google online translation: Other languages